Posts

Potpourri – Recent and Relevant Literature in Periprosthetic Fractures Around the Knee

/in /by

Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics | Vol 9 | Issue 1 |  January-June 2024 | page: 52-56 | Clevio Desouza, Nicholas Antao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jcorth.2024.v09i01.634

Author: Clevio Desouza [1, 2], Nicholas Antao [2]

[1] Centre for Bone and Joints, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India,
[2] Department of Orthopaedics, Holy Spirit Hospital, Andheri, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Clevio Joao Baptista Desouza,
Centre for Bone and Joints, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: ceviod@gmail.com

Abstract

Knee replacement stands as an effective treatment for alleviating pain and restoring function in cases of degenerative joint conditions. The escalating prevalence of knee replacements reflects their acknowledged success. Despite being a relatively uncommon complication, periprosthetic fractures surrounding total knee arthroplasties present intricate challenges, demanding proficiency in both arthroplasty and trauma reconstructive techniques from treating surgeons. The confluence of increased life expectancy and elevated functional expectations among elderly individuals may contribute to a heightened occurrence of periprosthetic fractures. Among these fractures, supracondylar fractures of the femur emerge as the most prevalent. This comprehensive review delves into the classification and diverse treatment modalities available for addressing periprosthetic fractures around total knee arthroplasties.
Keywords: Total Knee Arthroplasty, Replacement, Femur, Periprosthetic fractures

References

1. Vaidya SV, Jogani AD, Pachore JA, Armstrong R, Vaidya CS. India joining the world of hip and knee registries: Present status-a leap forward. Indian J Orthop 2020;55:46-55.
2. Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW. Classification of periprosthetic fractures complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30:209-14.
3. Engh GA, Rorabeck CH, editors. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Baltimore, Philadelphia, PA: Williams and Wilkins; 1997. p. 275-95.
4. Kim KI, Egol KA, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;446:167-75.
5. Felix NA, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD. Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;345:113-24.
6. Ortiguera CJ, Berry DJ. Patellar fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:532-40.
7. Benkovich V, Klassov Y, Mazilis B, Bloom S. Periprosthetic fractures of the knee: A comprehensive review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2020;30:387-99.
8. Sayum Filho J, Lenza M, Tamaoki MJ, Matsunaga FT, Belloti JC. Interventions for treating fractures of the patella in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;2:CD009651.
9. Cacciola G, Mancino F, De Meo F, Bruschetta A, De Martino I, Cavaliere P. Current reconstruction options in periprosthetic fractures around the knee. Geriatric Orthop Surg Rehabil 2021;12:21514593211023996.
10. Lombardo DJ, Siljander MP, Sobh A, Moore DD, Karadsheh MS. Periprosthetic fractures about total knee arthroplasty. Musculoskelet Surg 2020;104:135-43.
11. Pellegrino A, Coscione A, Santulli A, Pellegrino G, Paracuollo M. Knee periprosthetic fractures in the elderly: Current concept. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2022;14:38566.
12. Lari A, Kashif S, AlMukaimi A. Arthroscopic retrograde intramedullary nailing of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty-technique, safety, and outcomes. Arthroplast Today 2022;17:47-52.
13. Park YG, Kang H, Song JK, Lee J, Rho JY, Choi S. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with dual plating for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 2021;16:433.
14. Antao NA, Londhe S, Toor R, Shirishkar R, Aiyer S. Short-term results of a novel management of supracondylar fracture with coexisting osteoarthritis with bifold fixation and total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplasty. 2021 Dec 4;3(1):44.
15. Hassan S, Swamy GN, Malhotra R, Badhe NP. Periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur after total knee arthroplasty; Prevalence and outcomes following treatment. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2012;94-B:6.
16. Norrish AR, Jibri ZA, Hopgood P. The LISS plate treatment of supracondylar fractures above a total knee replacement: A case-control study. Acta Orthop Belg 2009;75:642-8.
17. Ebraheim NA, Sochacki KR, Liu X, Hirschfield G, Liu J. Locking plate fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with and without cerclage wires. Orthop Surg 2013;5:183-7.
18. Hoffman MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL, Koenig SJ, Tornetta P 3rd. Outcome of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following knee arthroplasty. Injury 2012;43:1084-9.
19. Ehlinger M, Adam P, Abane L, Rahme M, Moor BK, Arlettaz Y, et al. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011;19:1473-89.
20. Bezwada HP, Neubauer P, Baker J, Israelite CL, Johanson NA. Periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:453-8.
21. Herrera DA, Kregor PJ, Cole PA, Levy BA, Jönsson A, Zlowodzki M. Treatment of acute distal femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty: Systematic review of 415 cases (1981-2006). Acta Orthop 2008;79:22-7.
22. Bong MR, Egol KA, Koval KJ, Kummer FJ, Su ET, Iesaka K, et al. Comparison of the LISS and a retrograde-inserted supracondylar intramedullary nail for fixation of a periprosthetic distal femur fracture proximal to a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:876-81.
23. Kilicoglu OI, Akgül T, Sağlam Y, Yazıcıoğlu O. Comparison of locked plating and intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures after knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 2013;79:417-21.
24. Althausen PL, Lee MA, Finkemeier CG, Meehan JP, Rodrigo JJ. Operative stabilization of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of four treatment methods. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:834-9.
25. Ristevski B, Nauth A, Williams DS, Hall JA, Whelan DB, Bhandari M, et al. Systematic review of the treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2013;28:307-12.
26. Beris AE, Lykissas MG, Sioros V, Mavrodontidis AN, Korompilias AV. Femoral periprosthetic fracture in osteoporotic bone after a total knee replacement: Treatment with Ilizarov external fixation. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:1168.e9-12.
27. Kuzyk PR, Watts E, Backstein D. Revision total knee arthroplasty for the management of periprosthetic fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017;25:624-33.
28. Srinivasan K, Macdonald DA, Tzioupis CC, Giannoudis PV. Role of long stem revision knee prosthesis in periprosthetic and complex distal femoral fractures: A review of eight patients. Injury 2005;36:1094-102.
29. Chalmers BP, Syku M, Gausden EB, Blevins JL, Mayman DJ, Sculco PK. Contemporary distal femoral replacements for supracondylar femoral fractures around primary and revision total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2021;36:S351-7.
30. Khan S, Schmidt AH. Distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic fractures around total knee arthroplasty: When and how? J Knee Surg 2019;32:388-91.
31. Cannon SR. The use of megaprosthesis in the treatment of periprosthetic knee fractures. Int Orthop 2015;39:1945-50.
32. Windhager R, Schreiner M, Staats K, Apprich S. Megaprostheses in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the knee joint: Indication, technique, results and review of literature. Int Orthop 2016;40:935-43.

How to Cite this article: Desouza C, Antao N. Potpourri – Recent and Relevant Literature in Periprosthetic Fractures Around the Knee. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics 2024;January-June:9(1):52-56.

 (Article Text HTML)       (Download PDF)

Management of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures following Total Hip Replacement: A Case Series

/in /by

Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics | Vol 7 | Issue 1 |  Jan-Jun 2022 | page: 100-103 | Lokesh Kumar Yogi, Vijay Chandrakant Shinde, Moti Janardhan Naik, Vikash Kumar

DOI:10.13107/jcorth.2022.v07i01.485

Author: Lokesh Kumar Yogi [1], Vijay Chandrakant Shinde [1], Moti Janardhan Naik [1], Vikash Kumar [2]

[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Government Medical College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.

[2] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Lokesh Kumar Yogi,
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Government Medical College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: lokesh.k.yogi@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are not very uncommon. At present the Vancouver classification provides management algorithm for deciding treatment options but treatment options may vary between surgeons, where as in this study most patients managed were according to Vancouver classification management algorithm. The most common treatment modality for treating periprosthetic femoral fractures around a well-fixed stem is with osteosynthesis, but fracture with loose stem requires revision arthroplasty and fracture with poor bone requires bone graft augmentation.

Methods: We reviewed 21 consecutive cases with periprosthetic femoral fractures in association with THA between June 2018 and December 2020. Locking and non locking compression plates, wires, cables system were used for osteosynthesis. Most of fractures were managed according to Vancouver classification management algorithm but modified in some cases according to the surgeon’s skills and judgment.

Results: According to Vancouver classification, two patients had AL fractures, two patients had AG fractures, twelve Patients had B1, five patients had B2, two patients had B3 and one patient had type C fracture. Of these two cases were treated by conservatively, sixteen cases were treated by osteosynthesis, three cases by revision arthroplasty.

Conclusion: The careful analysis of implant stability and fracture patterns is crucial for the optimal treatment of Periprosthetic femoral fractures. Expert Surgeon’s skills are needed to deal with periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Keywords: Locking compression plate, periprosthetic fractures, total hip arthroplasty, Vancouver classification

References

  1. Lindahl H. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury. 2007;38(6):651-4.
  2. Berend ME, Smith A, Meding JB, Ritter MA, Lynch T, Davis K. Long-term outcome and risk factors of proximal femoral fracture in uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in 2551 hips. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(6 Suppl 2):53-9.
  3. Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur: principles of prevention and management. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:237-42.
  4. Haddad FS, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. The prevention of periprosthetic fractures in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30:191-207.
  5. Katzer A, Ince A, Wodtke J. Component exchange in treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21:572-9.
  6. Brady OH, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement. J Arthroplasty2000;15:59–62.
  7. Naqvi GA, Baig SA, Awan N. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification system of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:1047-1050.
  8. Tsiridis E, Haddad FS, Gie GA. The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements. Injury. 2003;34:95-105.
  9. Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Kambouroglou G. A unique peri-prosthetic fracture pattern in well xed femoral stems with polished, tapered, collarless design of total hip replacement. Injury. 2011; 42:1271-6.
  10. Campbell P, Mcwilliams TG. Periprosthetic femoral fractures. Curr Orthop. 2002;16:126-32.
  11. Lewallen DG, Berry DJ. Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty: treatment and results to date. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:243-9.
  12. Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G. Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish NationalHip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:857-65.
  13. Corten K, Vanrykel F, Bellemans J, Frederix PR, Simon JP, Broos PL. An algorithm for the surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur around a well-fixed femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91(11):1424–1430.
  14. Marsland D, Mears SC. A review of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2012;3(3):107–120.
  15. Streubel PN. Mortality after periprosthetic femur fractures. J Knee Surg2013;26:27–30.
  16. Sledge JB, Abiri A (2002) An algorithm for the treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. J Arthroplasty 17:887–892.
  17. Beals RK, Tower SS (1996) Periprosthetic fractures of the femur. An analysis of 93 fractures. Clin Orthop 327:238–246.
  18. Kavanagh BF. Femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23:249-57.
  19. McElfresh EC, Coventry MB. Femoral and pelvic fractures after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:483-92.
  20. Porsch M, Galm R, Hovy L, Starker M, Kerschbaumer F (1996) Total femur replacement following multiple periprosthetic fractures between ipsilateral hip and knee replacement in chronic rheumatoid arthritis. Case report of 2 patients. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 134(1):16-20.

 

How to Cite this article: Yogi LK, Shinde VC, Naik MJ, Kumar V. Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip replacement: A case series. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics Jan-Jun 2022;7(1):100-103.

 (Abstract    Full Text HTML)   (Download PDF)