Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics | Vol 7 | Issue 1 | Jan-Jun 2022 | page: 104-109 | Nicholas Antao, Clevio Desouza, Malcolm Pestonji, Jehangir Pestonji, Maulik Langal
Author: Nicholas Antao , Clevio Desouza , Malcolm Pestonji , Jehangir Pestonji , Maulik Langal 
 Department of Orthopaedics, Holy Spirit Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Address of Correspondence
Dr. Clevio Desouza,
Department of Orthopaedics, Holy Spirit Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Introduction: Low back pain affects roughly 70–80% of people at some point in their lives. Lumbar disc prolapse is one of the major reasons of low back pain that causes severe morbidity around the world, affecting primarily the working-class young population. We conducted this study to describe the unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) discectomy technique for lumbar herniated disc with the aim on how to perform theses procedure safely while also preserving the structures like the facet joints through the posterior interlaminar approach.
Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted between July 2019 and July 2021. The total number of patients included in the study was 41. A total of 54 levels of discectomy were done. The visual analog scale was used to assess back pain and lower leg symptoms, the Oswestry Disability Index was used to assess degrees of disability, and modified Macnab criteria were used to assess overall outcomes of treatment.
Results: Following the procedure, there was a significant improvement. The ultimate outcomes were excellent in 24 patients (58.53%), good in 15 (36.58%), fair in 2 (4.8%), and poor in 0 patients, according to the modified Macnab criteria. That is, 95.11% of patients had excellent or good results.
Conclusion: The UBE discectomy approach for lumbar disc herniation is a minimally invasive procedure that is both safe and successful. There is no soft-tissue degradation or facet joint destruction.
Keywords: Unilateral biportal endoscopy, ligamentum flavum, discectomy, visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, Macnab criteria
- Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 1999;354:581-5.
- Papageorgiou AC, Croft PR, Ferry S, Jayson MI, Silman AJ. Estimating the prevalence of low back pain in the general population: Evidence from the South Manchester Back Pain Survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1889-94.
- Aslam M, Khan FR, Huda N, Pant A, Julfiqar M, Goel A. Outcome of discectomy by fenestration technique in prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. Ann Int Med Dent Res 2015;1:286-90.
- Kim HS, Paudel B, Jang JS, Oh SH, Lee S, Park JE, et al. Percutaneous full endoscopic bilateral lumbar decompression of spinal stenosis through uniportal-contralateral approach: Techniques and preliminary results. World Neurosurg 2017;103:201-9.
- Mobbs RJ, Li J, Sivabalan P, Raley D, Rao PJ. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: Comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;21:179-86.
- Pao JL, Chen WC, Chen PQ. Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2009;18:672-8.
- Minamide A, Yoshida M, Yamada H, Nakagawa Y, Hashizume H, Iwasaki H, et al. Clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: A 5-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 2015;24:396-403.
- Lu WW, Luk KD, Ruan DK, Fei ZQ, Leong JC. Stability of the whole lumbar spine after multilevel fenestration and discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:1277-82.
- Okawa A, Shinomiya K, Takakuda K, Nakai O. Acadaveric study on the stability of lumbar segment after partial laminotomy and facetectomy with intact posterior ligaments. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:518-26.
- Bresnahan LE, Smith JS, Ogden AT, Quinn S, Cybulski GR, Simonian N, et al. Assessment of paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area after lumbar decompression: Minimally invasive versus open approaches. Clin Spine Surg 2017;30:E162-8.
- Hermantin FU, Peters T, Quartararo L, Kambin P. Aprospective, randomized study comparing the results of open discectomy with those of video-assisted arthroscopic microdiscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:958-65.
- Kambin P, O’Brien E, Zhou L, Schaffer JL. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy and selective fragmentectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;347:150-67.
- Casey KF, Chang MK, O’Brien ED, Yuan HA, McCullen GM, Schaffer J, et al. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy: Comparison of preoperative and postoperative imaging studies. Arthroscopy 1997;13:438-45.
- Parker SL, Xu R, McGirt MJ, Witham TF, Long DM, Bydon A. Long-term back pain after a single-level discectomy for radiculopathy: Incidence and health care cost analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2010;12:178-82.
- Fritsch EW, Heisel J, Rupp S. The failed back surgery syndrome: Reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: A report of 182 operative treatments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:626-33.
- Lewis PJ, Weir BK, Broad RW, Grace MG. Long-term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy. J Neurosurg 1987;67:49-53.
- He J, Xiao S, Wu Z, Yuan Z. Microendoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2016;25:1373-81.
- Choi CM, Chung JT, Lee SJ, Choi DJ. How I do it? Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Neurochir 2016;158:459-63.
- Mayer HM, Brock M, Berlien HP, Weber B. Percutaneous endoscopic laser discectomy (PELD). Anew surgical technique for non-sequestrated lumbar discs. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1992;54:53-8.
|How to Cite this article: Antao N, Desouza C, Pestonji M, Pestonji J, Langaliya M. Functional Outcome of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Ligamentum Flavum Preserving Discectomy. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics Jan-Jun 2022;7(1):104-109.|