Functional Outcome of Distal Humerus Intra-articular Fractures Treated with Pre-contoured Anatomical Locking Plates

/in /by

Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics | Vol 9 | Issue 1 |  January-June 2024 | page: 10-16 | Swapnil Chitnavis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jcorth.2024.v09i01.622

Author: Swapnil Chitnavis [1]

[1] Department of Orthopedics, Seth G. S. Medical College & K. E. M. Hospital, Parel, Maharashtra, India

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Swapnil Chitnavis,
Department of Orthopaedics, Seth G. S. Medical College & K. E. M. Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India.
Email – swapnilchitnavis@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The most difficult therapeutic challenge is treating humerus fractures, which might result in a subpar functional outcome. It is anticipated that early mobilization, anatomic reduction, and internal fixation will enhance the functional results. The purpose of this study is to assess the functional result, intercondylar fixation rate, and anatomically pre-contoured locking plate treatment of a distal humerus fracture.
Material and Method: This prospective research included patients with type 13-C2 distal humerus fractures, regardless of sex, who were hospitalized. Using the modified triceps tongue flap method, all patients received open reduction and internal fixation with anatomic pre-contoured locking plates and screws. Patients underwent 6 months of follow-up after surgery. They had follow-up evaluations using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) for clinical, radiological, and functional assessments. The Chi-square test was used to analyze the outcomes.
Observations: Males accounted for the majority of injuries (66.7% vs. 33.3%). The age distribution was 36.93 ± 14.67. Traffic accidents were the most common cause of injuries (66.7%). The most frequently affected side was the right upper limb (76.7%). Eighty percent of the patients had MEPS scores that were excellent or good overall. At the fracture site, the radiological union took an average of 10.2 ± 2.11 weeks. In the 6th week, the mean extension-flexion arc was 32.06°–104.06°, and in the 6th month, it was 11.55°–124.16°. Early superficial infection (3.3%), malunion (3.3%), ulnar neuropraxia (3.3%), and chronic osteomyelitis (3.3%) were the consequences. In conclusion, the functional result of the elbow was effectively preserved in distal humerus fractures treated with anatomic pre-contoured locking plates.
Keywords: Elbow joint, distal humerus intra articular fractures, bone plates, articular range of motion, osteomyelitis, MEPS, pre-contoured anatomical locking plate.

References

1. Galano GJ, Ahmad CS, Levine WN. Current treatment strategies for Bicolumnar distal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010;18:20-30.
2. Nauth A, McKee MD, Ristevski B, Hall J, Schemitsch EH. Distal humeral fractures in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:686-700.
3. O’Driscoll SW. Optimizing stability in distal humeral fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005;14:186-94.
4. Ring D, Jupiter JB. Fractures of the distal humerus. Orthop Clin North Am 2000;31:103-13.
5. Schwartz A, Oka R, Odell T, Mahar A. Biomechanical comparison of two different periarticular plating systems for stabilization of complex distal humerus fractures. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006;21:950-5.
6. Korner J, Diederichs G, Arzdorf M, Lill H, Josten C, Schneider E, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of methods of distal humerus fracture fixation using locking compression plates versus conventional reconstruction plates. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18:286-93.
7. Jawa A, McCarty P, Doornberg J, Harris M, Ring D. Extra-articular distalthird diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A comparison of functional bracing and plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:2343-7.
8. Paris H, Tropiano P, Clouet D’orval B, Chaudet H, Poitout DG. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus: Systematic plate fixation. Anatomic and functional results in 156 cases and a review of the literature. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2000;86:346-59.
9. Scolaro JA, Matzon JL, Mehta S. Tips and techniques-Surgical fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures with a posterolateral locking compression plate. Univ PA Orthop J 2009;19:103-8.
10. Eralp L, Kocaoglu M, Sar C, Atalar AC. Surgical treatment of distal intraarticular humeral fractures in adults. Int Orthop 2001;25:46-50.
11. Celli A, Donini MT, Minervini C. The use of pre-contoured plates in the treatment of C2-C3 fractures of the distal humerus: Clinical experience. Chir Organi Mov 2008;91:57-64.
12. Greiner S, Haas NP, Bail HJ. Outcome after open reduction and angular stable internal fixation for supra-intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus: Preliminary results with the LCP distal humerus system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008;128:723-9.
13. Lee SK, Kim KJ, Park KH, Choy WS. A comparison between orthogonal and parallel plating methods for distal humerus fractures: Aprospective randomized trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014;24:1123-31.
14. Stoffel K, Cunneen S, Morgan R, Nicholls R, Stachowiak G. Comparative stability of perpendicular versus parallel double-locking plating systems in osteoporotic comminuted distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Res 2008;26:778-84.
15. Gupta R, Khanchandani P. Intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus in adults: Acritical analysis of 55 cases. Injury 2002;33:511-5.
16. Kulkarni VS, Saxena S, Kulkarni SG, Shah PB, Dixit P, Arora N, et al. Management and functional outcome of closed intercondylar distal humerus fractures treated with dual plating in adults. J Trauma Orthop Surg 2016;11:24-9.
17. Chouhan S, Bhinde S, Shekhawat YS, Panwar N, Bajoria RS. A prospective study of functional outcome in intra articular distal humerus fracture treated with dual plating. Int J Orthop 2018;4:51-5.
18. Shaik RB, Reddy PV, Naidu KA. Study of clinical outcome in intra articular distal humerus fractures treated with dual plating. Int J Res Med Sci 2017;5:2438-41.
19. Gururaj G. Injuries in India: A national perspective. Background Papers: Burden of Disease in India Equitable Development-Healthy Future. New Delhi: National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2005. p. 325-47.
20. Reising K, Hauschild O, Strohm PC, Suedkamp NP. Stabilisation of articular fractures of the distal humerus: Early experience with a novel perpendicular plate system. Injury 2009;40:611-7.
21. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Torchia ME, O’Driscoll SW. Complex distal humeral fractures: Internal fixation with a principle-based parallel-plate technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:961-9.
22. Liu JJ, Ruan HJ, Wang JG, Fan CY, Zeng BF. Double-column fixation for type C fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18:646-51.
23. Ojha A, Singh SK. A study of functional outcome after osteosynthesis of intercondylar fracture of distal humerus in adults with pre-contoured locking compression plate system. Int J Res Orthop 2019;5:1107-12.
24. Soon JL, Chan BK, Low CO. Surgical fixation of intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus in adults. Injury 2004;35:44-54.

How to Cite this article: Chitnavis S. Functional Outcome of Distal Humerus Intra-articular Fractures Treated with Pre-contoured Anatomical Locking Plates. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics 2024 January-June;9(1):10-16.

 (Article Text HTML)       (Download PDF)