Online ISSN - 2456-6993 , Online Readers: 13
Menu
Original Article
DOI: 10.13107/jcorth.2025.v10i01.706
PDF Downloaded : Fulltext Viewed :
CROSSMARK LOGO

Correction of genu valgum deformity with femoral translation osteotomy and antegrade interlocking nail

Original Article | Volume 10 | Issue 1 | JCORTH Jan-Jun 2025 | Page 21-25 | Sujay Kulkarni [1], Ruta Kulkarni [1], Madhura Kulkarni [1], Zafer Satvilkar [1], Shekhar Malve [1], Milind Kulkarni [1]. DOI: 10.13107/jcorth.2025.v10i01.706
Authors: Sujay Kulkarni [1], Ruta Kulkarni [1], Madhura Kulkarni [1], Zafer Satvilkar [1], Shekhar Malve [1], Milind Kulkarni [1]
[1] Department of Orthopeadics, Post Graduate Institute of Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Miraj, Maharashtra, India
Address of Correspondence:
Dr. Sujay Kulkarni,
Department of Orthopeadics, Post Graduate Institute of Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Station Road, Extension Area, Miraj – 416410, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: jay2712@gmail.com
Article Received : 2025-01-11,
Article Accepted : 2025-04-10

Introduction: Genu valgum is a common deformity which is treated by almost every orthopedic surgeon. There are various methods to treat this deformity with usually satisfactory results. In adults, a femoral osteotomy is the most used method of correction of deformity. It is usually fixed by a plate. A large skin incision is required. The patient is usually kept non-weight bearing for a varying period. We present a technique in which a minimally invasive percutaneous osteotomy is performed and fixed with an antegrade interlocking nail. The implant used is familiar, readily available, and cost-effective. Weight-bearing is started immediately, and no immobilization is necessary.

Materials and Methods: We analyzed 22 cases of genu valgum treated with this osteotomy in a single center. We performed the percutaneous osteotomy and fixation with antegrade interlocking intramedullary nail. All patients were allowed to walk with a walker and full weight bearing from the next day as pain permitted. Every patient was called for follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months. At every follow-up, orthogonal X-rays were taken, and the range of motion (ROM) at the knee and hip was recorded.

Results: All 22 cases showed good union at the osteotomy site and full knee and hip ROM at 6 months. We had no wound complications or limb length discrepancy in any case.

Conclusion: This technique is a useful tool to add to the orthopedic surgeon’s armamentarium. It is a cost-effective and minimally invasive solution to a very common problem, using familiar implants. A comparative study is warranted to study its superiority to other techniques.

Keywords: Genu valgum, Interlocking nail, Osteotomy, Minimally invasive.

References

  • 1.
    Patel M, Nelson R. Genu valgum. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.
    Vaishya R, Shah M, Agarwal AK, Vijay V. Growth modulation by hemi epiphysiodesis using eight-plate in Genu valgum in Paediatric population. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2018;9:327-33. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.
    Salenius P, Vankka E. The development of the tibiofemoral angle in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:259-61. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.
    Heath CH, Staheli LT. Normal limits of knee angle in white children–genu varum and genu valgum. J Pediatr Orthop 1993;13:259-62. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.
    Boero S, Michelis MB, Riganti S. Use of the eight-plate for angular correction of knee deformities due to idiopathic and pathologic physis: Initiating treatment according to etiology. J Child Orthop 2011;5:209-16. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.
    Jelinek EM, Bittersohl B, Martiny F, Scharfstädt A, Krauspe R, Westhoff B. The 8-plate versus physeal stapling for temporary hemiepiphyseodesis correcting genu valgum and genu varum: A retrospective analysis of thirty five patients. Int Orthop 2012;36:599-605. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.
    Blount WP, Clarke GR. Control of bone growth by epiphyseal stapling; a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1949;31a:464-78. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.
    Ismailidis P, Schmid C, Werner J, Nüesch C, Mündermann A, Pagenstert G, et al. Distal femoral osteotomy for the valgus knee: Indications, complications, clinical and radiological outcome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023;143:6147-57. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.
    Chahla J, Mitchell JJ, Liechti DJ, Moatshe G, Menge TJ, Dean CS, et al. Opening- and closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy: A systematic review of outcomes for isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis. Orthop J Sports Med 2016;4:2325967116649901. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.
    Wylie JD, Jones DL, Hartley MK, Kapron AL, Krych AJ, Aoki SK, et al. Distal femoral osteotomy for the valgus knee: Medial closing wedge versus lateral opening wedge: A systematic review. Arthroscopy 2016;32:2141-7. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.
    O’Malley MP, Pareek A, Reardon PJ, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Distal femoral osteotomy: Lateral opening wedge technique. Arthrosc Tech 2016;5:e725-30. [Google Scholar]
Spread the love
Visited 33 times, 2 visit(s) today
How to Cite This Article: Kulkarni S, Kulkarni R, Kulkarni M, Satvilkar Z, Malve S, Kulkarni M. Correction of genu valgum deformity with femoral translation osteotomy and antegrade interlocking nail. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics 2025 June, 10(06): 21-25.