Posts

Translate this page into:

Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Back Pain Management: A Systematic Review of Mobile and Digital Health Interventions

Review Article | Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics | Vol 10 | Issue 2 | July-December 2025 | page: 34-36 | Vishal Kumar, Manuj Jain, Aditya Gupta, Arvind Vatkar, Akashdeep Singh, Sarvdeep Singh, Sachin Kale

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jcorth.2025.v10.i02.770

Open Access License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Copyright Statement: Copyright © 2025; The Author(s).

Submitted Date: 13 Aug 2025, Review Date: 10 Sep 2025, Accepted Date: 10 Oct 2025 & Published Date: 10 Dec 2025


Author: Vishal Kumar [1], Manuj Jain [2], Aditya Gupta [1], Arvind Vatkar [3], Akashdeep Singh [1], Sarvdeep Singh [1], Sachin Kale [4]

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
[2] Department of Orthopaedics, 158 Base Hospital, Bagdogra, West Bengal, India
[3] Department of Orthoapedics, MGM Medical College, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[4] Department of Orthopaedics, Dr D Y Patil School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.


Address of Correspondence

Dr. Vishal Kumar,
Department of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
E-mail: drkumarvishal@gmail.com


Abstract


The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of artificial intelligence (AI)-based applications in the management of back pain, particularly through mobile health solutions. The review examines current AI interventions for their potential to improve pain outcomes, enhance self-management, and increase patient adherence. We conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore, following a rigorous inclusion and exclusion process. Studies were selected based on their focus on AI-enabled mobile applications specifically designed to aid back pain patients, with data extracted on outcomes such as pain reduction, patient engagement, and quality of life improvements. The findings reveal promising results, with many AI applications achieving notable success in pain management and user satisfaction; however, certain limitations, such as user engagement rates and app accessibility, were identified. This review underscores the potential of AI-driven health interventions in personalizing care and improving back pain outcomes, while also highlighting areas for future research, particularly in advancing AI algorithms and expanding access to digital health tools.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence, back pain, mobile health applications, pain management, systematic review, digital health, patient adherence.


References


1. Lo WL, Lei D, Li L, Huang DF, Tong KF. The perceived benefits of an artificial intelligence-embedded mobile app implementing evidence-based guidelines for the self-management of chronic neck and back pain: Observational study. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2018;6:e198.
2. Amorim P, Paulo JR, Silva PA, Peixoto P, Castelo-Branco M, Martins H. Machine learning applied to low back pain rehabilitation-a systematic review. Int J Digit Health 2021;1:10.
3. Rughani G, Nilsen TI, Wood K, Mair FS, Hartvigsen J, Mork PJ, et al. The selfBACK artificial intelligence-based smartphone app can improve low back pain outcome even in patients with high levels of depression or stress. Eur J Pain 2023;27:568-79.
4. Marcuzzi A, Nordstoga AL, Bach K, Aasdahl L, Nilsen TI, Bardal EM, et al. Effect of an artificial intelligence-based self-management app on musculoskeletal health in patients with neck and/or low back pain referred to specialist care: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6:e2320400.
5. Zhang M, Zhu L, Lin SY, Herr K, Chi CL, Demir I, et al. Using artificial intelligence to improve pain assessment and pain management: A scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023;30:570-87.
6. Nordstoga AL, Aasdahl L, Sandal LF, Dalager T, Kongsvold A, Mork PJ, et al. The role of pain duration and pain intensity on the effectiveness of app-delivered self-management for low back pain (selfBACK): Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2023;11:e40422.
7. Hornung AL, Hornung CM, Mallow GM, Barajas JN, Rush A 3rd, Sayari AJ, et al. Artificial intelligence in spine care: Current applications and future utility. Eur Spine J 2022;31:2057-81.
8. Hasan F, Mudey A, Joshi A. Role of Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence and machine learning in musculoskeletal pain: A scoping review. Cureus 2023;15:e37352.
9. Kawchuk GN, Guan R, Keen C, Hauer B, Kondrak G. Using artificial intelligence algorithms to identify existing knowledge within the back pain literature. Eur Spine J 2020;29:1917-24.


How to Cite this Article: Kumar V, Jain M, Gupta A, Vatkar A, Singh A, Singh S, Kale S. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Back Pain Management: A Systematic Review of Mobile and Digital Health Interventions. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics. July-December 2025;10(2):34-36.

 (Article Text HTML)  (Download PDF)


Translate this page into:

Osteoblastoma of the lumbar spine in an adolescent: A case report and review of literature

Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics | Vol 6 | Issue 2 |  Jul-Dec 2021 | page: 45-48 | Bhushan Sagade, Sarang Rokade, Arjun Dhawale, Abhay Nene


Author: Bhushan Sagade [1], Sarang Rokade [1], Arjun Dhawale [1], Abhay Nene [1]

[1] Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Dhawale Arjun A,
Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India
E-mail: arjundhawale@hotmail.com


Abstract

Introduction: Osteoblastomas are primary bone tumors representing 1% of all bone tumors and 10% of all spinal osseous neoplasms with a predilection for posterior elements.
Case Report:  A 13-year-old boy with insidious backache for six months presented with progressive radiating paraesthesia and claudication, restricted lumbar motion and positive straight leg test bilaterally with weakness of left ankle dorsiflexion. Radiograph showed an subtle expansile lytic lesion in the L3 posterior elements. CT and MRI revealed a space-occupying lesion of the L3 vertebra lamina, involving the left pedicle causing severe spinal canal stenosis. Excision of the posterior elements of the L3 vertebra including the facet and left pedicle and short segment fixation from L2-L4 using autogenous rib was done.

At two years postoperatively, he was asymptomatic, neurologically normal, showing radiographic evidence of union with no recurrence.
Conclusions: Autogenous structural rib can be used for posterolateral fusion after osteoblastoma excision with potential instability.
Keywords: Osteoblastoma, back pain, rib graft, postero-lateral fusion, en-bloc resection


References

1. Healey JH, Ghelman B. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. Current concepts and recent advances. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Mar;(204):76-85.
2. Kan P, Schmidt MH. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the spine. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2008 Jan;19(1):65-70.
3. Chi JH, Bydon A, Hsieh P, Witham T, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL. Epidemiology and demographics for primary vertebral tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2008 Jan;19(1):1-4.
4. Galgano MA, Goulart CR, Iwenofu H, Chin LS, Lavelle W, Mendel E. Osteoblastomas of the spine: a comprehensive
review. Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Aug;41(2):E4.
5. Elder BD, Goodwin CR, Kosztowski TA, Lo SF, Bydon A, Wolinsky JP, Jallo GI, Gokaslan ZL, Witham TF, Sciubba DM.
Surgical Management of Osteoblastoma of the Spine: Case Series and Review of the Literature. Turk Neurosurg. 2016;26(4):601-7.
6. Harrop JS, Schmidt MH, Boriani S, Shaffrey CI. Aggressive “benign” primary spine neoplasms: osteoblastoma aneurysmal bone cyst, and giant cell tumor. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22 Suppl):S39-47.
7. Boriani S, Amendola L, Bandiera S, Simoes CE, Alberghini M, Di Fiore M, Gasbarrini A. Staging and treatment of osteoblastoma in the mobile spine: a review of 51 cases. Eur Spine J. 2012 Oct;21(10):2003-10.
8. Ruggieri P, Huch K, Mavrogenis AF, Merlino B, Angelini A. Osteoblastoma of the sacrum: report of 18 cases and analysis of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jan 15;39(2):E97-E103.
9. Kadhim M, Binitie O, O’Toole P, Grigoriou E, De Mattos CB, Dormans JP. Surgical resection of osteoid osteoma and
osteoblastoma of the spine. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2017 Jul;26(4):362-369.
10. Reynolds JJ, Rothenfluh DA, Athanasou N, Wilson S, Kieser DC. Neoadjuvant denosumab for the treatment of a sacral osteoblastoma. Eur Spine J. 2018 Jul;27(Suppl 3):446-452.

How to Cite this article: Sagade BS, Rokade SN, Dhawale AA, Nene AM. Osteoblastoma of the lumbar spine in an adolescent: A case report and review of literature. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics Jul-Dec 2021;6(2):45-48.

 (Abstract    Full Text HTML)   (Download PDF)