Original Article | Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics | Vol 10 | Issue 2 | July-December 2025 | page: 76-88 | V Sriram, K K Nrupathunga, L Sachin Patel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jcorth.2025.v10.i02.782

Open Access License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Copyright Statement: Copyright © 2025; The Author(s).

Submitted Date: 29 Jul 2025, Review Date: 10 Sep 2025, Accepted Date: 18 Oct 2025 & Published Date: 10 Dec 2025

Author: V Sriram [1], K K Nrupathunga [2], L Sachin Patel [3] 

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, East Point Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India,
[2] Department of Orthopaedics, BGS MCH Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India,
[3] Department of Orthopaedics, PES University Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Address of Correspondence

Dr. L Sachin Patel,
Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, PES University Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
E-mail: spatel.bl@gmail.com

Abstract

Background/Aims: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the second common rheumatologic disorder and the most prevalent joint disease in India, affecting 20–40% of the population. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been used to alleviate pain in musculoskeletal conditions. Despite the fact that LLLT is extensively used, the consequences from both experimental and medical research continue to be inconsistent. This study aims to assess the pain-relieving effectiveness of LLLT in patients with Kellgren–Lawrence Grade I and II knee OA, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).
Materials and Methods: The study was carried out at a tertiary care center in Bengaluru. Fifty patients were recruited primarily based on the following inclusion criteria:
1. Idiopathic knee OA
2. Grade I or II bilateral knee OA confirmed by X-ray
3. Average pain intensity of 40 or greater on a 100-mm VAS
4. Age: 45–65 years, of both sexes.
Patients attended weekly therapy sessions. Each session included isometric quadriceps muscle contractions and 10 repetitions of active range of motion exercises for the knee joint, following a 5-min LLLT application.
Results: On X-ray, 52% (22 patients) had Grade I OA knee, and 48% (20 patients) had Grade II OA knee. There was a significant reduction in VAS and WOMAC post-treatment scores compared to pre-treatment.
Conclusion: OA is a long-term, degenerative condition that causes deterioration of joint tissues, resulting in excessive pain, stiffness, and restricted mobility. Treatment strategies for OA continue to be crucial for research. Our study suggests a widespread improvement in pain alleviation with LLLT. Further studies are needed to compare the efficacy of LLLT with other pain management strategies and explore combined treatment plans.
Keywords: Low-level Laser, OA knee, VAS, WOMAC

References

1. Losina E, Weinstein AM, Reichmann WM, Burbine SA, Solomon DH, Daigle ME, et al. Lifetime risk and age at diagnosis of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in the US. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013;65:703-11.
2. Hutton CW. Osteoarthritis: The cause not result of joint failure? Ann Rheum Dis 1989;48:958-61.
3. Litwic A, Edwards MH, Dennison EM, Cooper C. Epidemiology and burden of osteoarthritis. Br Med Bull 2013;105:185-99.
4. Scheiman JM. Gastrointestinal toxicity caused by NSAIDs is the most frequent drug side effect in the US. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1996;25:279-98.
5. Cheing GL, Hui-Chan CW, Chan KM. Does four weeks of TENS and/or isometric exercise produce cumulative reduction of osteoarthritic knee pain? Clin Rehabil 2002;16:749-60.
6. Talbot LA, Gaines JM, Ling SM, Metter EJ. A home-based protocol of electrical muscle stimulation for quadriceps muscle strength in older adults with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol 2003;30:1571-8.
7. Kozanoglu E, Basaran S, Guzel R, Guler-Uysal F. Short term efficacy of ibuprofen phonophoresis versus continuous ultrasound therapy in knee osteoarthritis. Swiss Med Wkly 2003;133:333-8.
8. Deyle GD, Henderson NE, Matekel RL, Ryder MG, Garber MB, Allison SC. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy and exercise in osteoarthritis of the knee: A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Int Med 2000;132:173-81.
9. Oral A, Ilieva EM, Küçükdeveci AA, Varela E, Valero R, Berteanu M, et al. Local soft tissue musculoskeletal disorders and injuries. The role of physical and rehabilitation medicine physicians. The European perspective based on the best evidence. A paper by the UEMS-PRM section professional practice committee. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2013;49:727-42.
10. Özdemir F, Birtane M, Kokino S. The clinical efficacy of low-power laser therapy on pain and function in cervical osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2001;20:181-4.
11. Simunovic Z, Trobonjaca T, Trobonjaca Z. Treatment of medial and lateral epicondylitis–tennis and golfer’s elbow–with low level laser therapy: A multicenter double blind, placebo-controlled clinical study on 324 patients. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1998;16:145-51.
12. Haker EH, Lundeberg TC. Lateral epicondylalgia: Report of noneffective midlaser treatment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:984-8.
13. Vecchio P, Cave M, King V, Adebajo AO, Smith M, Hazleman BL. A double-blind study of the effectiveness of low level laser treatment of rotator cuff tendinitis. Rheumatology 1993;32:740-2.
14. Goats GC, Hunter JA, Flett E, Stirling A. Low intensity laser and phototherapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Physiotherapy 1996;82:311-20.

 (Article Text HTML)  (Download PDF)