Unveiling the Layers: Mental Health Dynamics in Orthopedic Trauma Patients and Future Implications
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics | Vol 10 | Issue 1 | January-June 2025 | page: 61-64 | Sudip Bhattacharya, Sitanshu Barik, Vishal Kumar, Abhishek Bhati, Aditya Vyasv, Moin Darvesh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jcorth.2025.v10i01.722
Open Access License: CC BY-NC 4.0
Copyright Statement: Copyright © 2025; The Author(s).
Submitted Date: 13 April 2025, Review Date: 28 April 2025, Accepted Date: 29 May 2025 & Published Date: 30 Jun 2025
Author: Sudip Bhattacharya [1], Sitanshu Barik [2], Vishal Kumar [3], Abhishek Bhati [4], Aditya Vyasv [ ], Moin Darvesh [4]
[1] Department of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS Deoghar, Deoghar, Rampur, Jharkhand, India,
[2] Department of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS Nagpur, Dahegaon, Maharashtra, India,
[3] Department of Community and Family Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India,
[4] Department of Orthopaedics, D Y Patil School of Medicine and Hospital, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Address of Correspondence
Dr Sitanshu Barik,
Associate Professor, AIIMS Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: sitanshubarik@gmail.com
Abstract
Orthopaedic trauma care has traditionally operated within the confines of the biomedical model, focusing on physical recovery markers such as bone healing and functional restoration. However, this narrow approach often overlooks the profound influence of psychological and social factors on recovery. Emerging evidence underscores that mental health conditions—including depression, anxiety, PTSD, and substance use disorders—substantially affect rehabilitation outcomes in orthopaedic trauma patients. Psychological distress not only prolongs recovery times but also impairs treatment adherence and functional return. Moreover, patients’ cognitive responses, such as catastrophizing and self-efficacy, play pivotal roles in shaping their rehabilitation trajectories. Catastrophizing magnifies perceived disability and pain, while high self-efficacy fosters resilience and active engagement in recovery.
To address these psychosocial dimensions, the biopsychosocial model of care is gaining traction. Targeted interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), psychoeducation, graded physical exposure, and goal-setting have proven effective in reducing distress and enhancing recovery motivation. Furthermore, injury-specific strategies—for conditions like femoral fractures, ACL tears, and spinal surgeries—can be tailored to address patients’ unique informational and emotional needs through in-hospital counselling, digital resources, and home-based support.
The integration of mental health screening, early referral, and multidisciplinary intervention is essential in orthopaedic practice. Clinical guidelines from leading orthopaedic bodies now recommend psychosocial evaluation as part of trauma care. Ultimately, incorporating structured, time-efficient, and scalable interventions into routine orthopaedic workflows—especially in high-volume settings—can improve both mental health outcomes and physical rehabilitation. This shift toward holistic, patient-centred care is imperative for optimizing outcomes in orthopaedic trauma recovery.
Keywords: Orthopedics, Mental health, Caregivers
References
1. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977;196:129-36.
2. Kellezi B, Coupland C, Morriss R, Beckett K, Joseph S, Barnes J, et al. The impact of psychological factors on recovery from injury: A multicentre cohort study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2017;52:855-66.
3. Reichman M, Bakhshaie J, Grunberg VA, Doorley JD, Vranceanu AM. What are orthopaedic healthcare professionals’ attitudes toward addressing patient psychosocial factors? A mixed-methods investigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022;480:248-62.
4. Van der Kolk B. Posttraumatic stress disorder and the nature of trauma. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2000;2:7-22.
5. Keizer BM, Wegener ST. AAOS/major extremity trauma and rehabilitation consortium clinical practice guideline summary for evaluation of psychosocial factors influencing recovery from orthopaedic trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022;30:e307-12.
6. Large J, Naumann DN, Fellows J, Connor C, Ahmed Z. Clinical outcomes following major trauma for patients with a diagnosis of depression: A large UK database analysis. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2021;6:e000819.
7. Yang Y, Tang TT, Chen MR, Xiang MY, Li LL, Hou XL. Prevalence and association of anxiety and depression among orthopaedic trauma inpatients: A retrospective analysis of 1994 cases. J Orthop Surg Res 2020;15:587.
8. Vincent HK, Horodyski M, Vincent KR, Brisbane ST, Sadasivan KK. Psychological distress after orthopedic trauma: Prevalence in patients and implications for rehabilitation. PM R 2015;7:978-89.
9. Levy RS, Hebert CK, Munn BG, Barrack RL. Drug and alcohol use in orthopedic trauma patients: A prospective study. J Orthop Trauma 1996;10:21-7.
10. Gosens T, Den Oudsten BL. Psychology in orthopedics and traumatology: An instructional review. EFORT Open Rev 2023;8:245-52.
| How to Cite this article: Bhattacharya S, Barik S, Kumar V, Bhati A, Vyasv A, Darvesh M. Unveiling the Layers: Mental Health Dynamics in Orthopedic Trauma Patients and Future Implications. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics January-June 2025;10(1):61-64. |
(Article Text HTML) (Download PDF)
